<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing, Bong Yahoo Search Is Dead!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead</link>
	<description>The random thoughts of Matt Keegan, writing style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on Smart Ways To Enact Real Health Care Reform &#124; SayEducate</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-7551</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on Smart Ways To Enact Real Health Care Reform &#124; SayEducate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-7551</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] With: Everyone - 47 seconds ago &#124; Congress, doctors, health insurance, [...]&#039;At 2009-07-30 10:46:50 Bing, Bong Yahoo Search Is Dead! said:&#039;[...] operating system. LarryJackson&#180;s last blog ..Microsoft and Yahoo to take on [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] With: Everyone &#8211; 47 seconds ago | Congress, doctors, health insurance, [...]&#39;At 2009-07-30 10:46:50 Bing, Bong Yahoo Search Is Dead! said:&#39;[...] operating system. LarryJackson&#180;s last blog ..Microsoft and Yahoo to take on [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew C. Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-7262</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew C. Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-7262</guid>
		<description>Roy, I am glad that you have found Bing to be so beneficial. I, too, have discovered that a growing number of my visitors are coming from Bing. In addition, quite a few pages are performing rather well in Bing SERPs, therefore I&#039;m thrilled to see those good results as well.

A lot has changed since I first wrote this article, so I am sure we&#039;ll all be discovering that Bing has benefits not realized with Google search. I like the idea of maximizing your Bing presence while not being concerned about Google. I think there is room for this -- if you perform very well with Bing, then how you do with Google won&#039;t matter. You&#039;ll carve out a niche with Bing, which will only grow greater when Bing replaces Yahoo search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy, I am glad that you have found Bing to be so beneficial. I, too, have discovered that a growing number of my visitors are coming from Bing. In addition, quite a few pages are performing rather well in Bing SERPs, therefore I&#8217;m thrilled to see those good results as well.</p>
<p>A lot has changed since I first wrote this article, so I am sure we&#8217;ll all be discovering that Bing has benefits not realized with Google search. I like the idea of maximizing your Bing presence while not being concerned about Google. I think there is room for this &#8212; if you perform very well with Bing, then how you do with Google won&#8217;t matter. You&#8217;ll carve out a niche with Bing, which will only grow greater when Bing replaces Yahoo search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-7258</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-7258</guid>
		<description>I dont know guys.... From a developers perspective and small business marketing professional, Google has some very distinct flaws. It is starting to heavily monetize its organic search results with directories like merchant circle, linkedin, prweb, yellowpages, superpages etc. Often in competitive search terms the first ten results are of these companies that have a financial relationship with Google. Are those results relevant to my search? Not when a directory shows up for a local search and there are no local businesses advertising with that directory. The only reason my company is #1 in our primary search term is a relationship I have with merchant circle but my organic result for my actual website that has 100X the content of what is posted on merchant circle ranks #18. So if you are searching for relevancy are google&#039;s searches more relevant due to paid placement? I think not. I am very happy with bing because organic results are organic results. Google needs to stop favoring these directories that pay them for better ranking so they can sell their ads and let organic be organic and sponsored be sponsored. 

My company consistently ranks higher in Bing. When bing becomes 28% of the market I will focus on making Bing happy because even with that limited market share I will be seen by more people because I am on the first page across the board for all my keyword search terms. If 80% of my customers are coming from a search engine that has 30% of the market, why should I focus on making Google happy? As a marketing consultant I can only take on so much work so growth is not important, a constant flow of customers is.

My point is this: It takes a lot of time to do what is needed to rank well in search results with Google. I do nothing for Bing and since it has been live I have had a lot more business because I rank better in Bing results. If I do not spend the time to make Google happy, my content that is the most relevant for search results will not be in Google&#039;s search results. People will switch to bing because its results are more relevant due to the fact its results are not filled with all this directory garbage that I am competing with in Google.

My time is better spent getting paid for it than participating in Google&#039;s dog and pony show to get ranked well in it&#039;s search results and I certainly am not going to pay all these directories what would amount to $700-$1000 a month to have the same placement I am getting from Bing for free. Our website is fantastic, error free, and SEO&#039;d to the hilt but because we do not have a lot of PR7 links pointing to us and our domain is not very old we suffer in Google...

But we are a great company that does a great job and our content is fantastic.... Where is the logic?

Bing is taking market share from Google because I went from using Google to using Bing and I am sure I am not they only one. I support Bing and I will continue to do so and that is the viral marketing Bing is starting to get. Bing is a search engine, Google is becoming a paid directory.
.-= Roy Hunter&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mymarketingcompany.com/wordpress/internet-copywriting-writing-website-copy-part-two/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Internet Copywriting: Writing Website Copy, Part Two&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know guys&#8230;. From a developers perspective and small business marketing professional, Google has some very distinct flaws. It is starting to heavily monetize its organic search results with directories like merchant circle, linkedin, prweb, yellowpages, superpages etc. Often in competitive search terms the first ten results are of these companies that have a financial relationship with Google. Are those results relevant to my search? Not when a directory shows up for a local search and there are no local businesses advertising with that directory. The only reason my company is #1 in our primary search term is a relationship I have with merchant circle but my organic result for my actual website that has 100X the content of what is posted on merchant circle ranks #18. So if you are searching for relevancy are google&#8217;s searches more relevant due to paid placement? I think not. I am very happy with bing because organic results are organic results. Google needs to stop favoring these directories that pay them for better ranking so they can sell their ads and let organic be organic and sponsored be sponsored. </p>
<p>My company consistently ranks higher in Bing. When bing becomes 28% of the market I will focus on making Bing happy because even with that limited market share I will be seen by more people because I am on the first page across the board for all my keyword search terms. If 80% of my customers are coming from a search engine that has 30% of the market, why should I focus on making Google happy? As a marketing consultant I can only take on so much work so growth is not important, a constant flow of customers is.</p>
<p>My point is this: It takes a lot of time to do what is needed to rank well in search results with Google. I do nothing for Bing and since it has been live I have had a lot more business because I rank better in Bing results. If I do not spend the time to make Google happy, my content that is the most relevant for search results will not be in Google&#8217;s search results. People will switch to bing because its results are more relevant due to the fact its results are not filled with all this directory garbage that I am competing with in Google.</p>
<p>My time is better spent getting paid for it than participating in Google&#8217;s dog and pony show to get ranked well in it&#8217;s search results and I certainly am not going to pay all these directories what would amount to $700-$1000 a month to have the same placement I am getting from Bing for free. Our website is fantastic, error free, and SEO&#8217;d to the hilt but because we do not have a lot of PR7 links pointing to us and our domain is not very old we suffer in Google&#8230;</p>
<p>But we are a great company that does a great job and our content is fantastic&#8230;. Where is the logic?</p>
<p>Bing is taking market share from Google because I went from using Google to using Bing and I am sure I am not they only one. I support Bing and I will continue to do so and that is the viral marketing Bing is starting to get. Bing is a search engine, Google is becoming a paid directory.<br />
.-= Roy Hunter&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.mymarketingcompany.com/wordpress/internet-copywriting-writing-website-copy-part-two/" rel="nofollow">Internet Copywriting: Writing Website Copy, Part Two</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew C. Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-7080</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew C. Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-7080</guid>
		<description>@Chris -- I hear you! Google rules, while the other two have a lot to work on.

@Karl -- I&#039;m staying with the Big G. I like Bing for fun, but when it comes to serious search, my money is with Google.

@nour -- Google rules in the US as well as overseas. They are dominate and it will take some might mistakes on their part if they&#039;ll ever cede marketshare to Microsoft. I just don&#039;t see that happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris &#8212; I hear you! Google rules, while the other two have a lot to work on.</p>
<p>@Karl &#8212; I&#8217;m staying with the Big G. I like Bing for fun, but when it comes to serious search, my money is with Google.</p>
<p>@nour &#8212; Google rules in the US as well as overseas. They are dominate and it will take some might mistakes on their part if they&#8217;ll ever cede marketshare to Microsoft. I just don&#8217;t see that happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nour</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-6945</link>
		<dc:creator>nour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-6945</guid>
		<description>its like a search engine competetion and now microsoft came in this domain and wins bing oh wow  the competetion will be on fire but i thinks google wins because this year with even there was the international problem you know google made more money then the last year actually google is the best but i think microsoft will not agree about that and will force google :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its like a search engine competetion and now microsoft came in this domain and wins bing oh wow  the competetion will be on fire but i thinks google wins because this year with even there was the international problem you know google made more money then the last year actually google is the best but i think microsoft will not agree about that and will force google <img src='http://www.matthewkeegan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Foxley</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Foxley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>I like Bing but it just isn&#039;t Google. I&#039;ll be watching the development of this very closely but I can&#039;t see people shifting away from the big G in any hurry.

Karl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Bing but it just isn&#8217;t Google. I&#8217;ll be watching the development of this very closely but I can&#8217;t see people shifting away from the big G in any hurry.</p>
<p>Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-6890</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-6890</guid>
		<description>Bing and Yahoo Two Crap Search engines Don&#039;t make one Good one I am Sticking with Google.
.-= chris&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/letblog/nDpQ/~3/kkchs_WFK7U/use-space-to-save-your-facestoring.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Use Space to Save your Face,Storing Pictures Online&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing and Yahoo Two Crap Search engines Don&#8217;t make one Good one I am Sticking with Google.<br />
.-= chris&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/letblog/nDpQ/~3/kkchs_WFK7U/use-space-to-save-your-facestoring.html" rel="nofollow">Use Space to Save your Face,Storing Pictures Online</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>Choice? You got that right, Larry. Microsoft&#039;s definition of choice is Windows or nothing. And, with Bing combining with Yahoo Search, consumers will choose either that or Google Search.

Mind you, Google Search is dominate so there really hasn&#039;t been much competition to speak of. I like Bing as an alternative to Google Search, but the lion&#039;s share of my searches are still with the Big G.
.-= Matt Keegan&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sayeducate.com/2009/07/30/smart-ways-to-enact-real-health-care-reform/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Smart Ways To Enact Real Health Care Reform&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choice? You got that right, Larry. Microsoft&#8217;s definition of choice is Windows or nothing. And, with Bing combining with Yahoo Search, consumers will choose either that or Google Search.</p>
<p>Mind you, Google Search is dominate so there really hasn&#8217;t been much competition to speak of. I like Bing as an alternative to Google Search, but the lion&#8217;s share of my searches are still with the Big G.<br />
.-= Matt Keegan&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.sayeducate.com/2009/07/30/smart-ways-to-enact-real-health-care-reform/" rel="nofollow">Smart Ways To Enact Real Health Care Reform</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryJackson</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-6888</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryJackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-6888</guid>
		<description>It looks to me like the search engine competition just went from three to two competitors. Personally, I don&#039;t think Bing or Yahoo or whatever they call it is ever going to be able to compete with Google. Google is much more accurate with it&#039;s results and no other search engine seems to be able to come close to them. That&#039;s why Google has 67% of the market and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see them get more.

The irony of the situation is how Microsoft is putting out statements that extol the agreement as one that will give consumers more choice. They certainly were not thinking about consumer choice when they hard coded Internet Explorer into the Windows operating system. ;)
.-= LarryJackson&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ldjackson.net/technolocy/microsoft-and-yahoo-to-take-on-google/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft and Yahoo to take on Google&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks to me like the search engine competition just went from three to two competitors. Personally, I don&#8217;t think Bing or Yahoo or whatever they call it is ever going to be able to compete with Google. Google is much more accurate with it&#8217;s results and no other search engine seems to be able to come close to them. That&#8217;s why Google has 67% of the market and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see them get more.</p>
<p>The irony of the situation is how Microsoft is putting out statements that extol the agreement as one that will give consumers more choice. They certainly were not thinking about consumer choice when they hard coded Internet Explorer into the Windows operating system. <img src='http://www.matthewkeegan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
.-= LarryJackson&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.ldjackson.net/technolocy/microsoft-and-yahoo-to-take-on-google/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="nofollow">Microsoft and Yahoo to take on Google</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2009/07/30/bing-bong-yahoo-search-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-6886</link>
		<dc:creator>Your page is now on StumbleUpon!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=1597#comment-6886</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Your page is on StumbleUpon [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

