Bada BING, Bada Boom: Microsoft’s New Search Engine Emerges
Its about time that Microsoft Corporation offered up a new web search engine, having failed miserably in its previous attempts to do so. Blaming Google’s success for long term failures is easy to do, but when you even trail Yahoo Search badly, then there is much room for improvement.
Bing Goes Live
Whispers of a new Microsoft search engine have been heard for some time with a full scale announcement and preview offered late last week. Today is the date that Bing officially goes live, but if you’re like most of the other curious folks who have a passion for search, then you’ve already checked it out in preview. Often too.
Until now, we’ve had to endure Live Search, the most recent version of the Microsoft search engine prior to Bing. Admittedly, I use Google Search almost exclusively, heading over to Yahoo Search only when I need to check Yahoo Site Explorer out to see how my websites are performing. MSN is usually a non-thought, never getting a chance to prove itself simply because it has failed to prove itself so often in the past.
Giving Other Search Engines A Chance
Hey, don’t blame me — I gave Cuil a chance but quickly abandoned it when it turned out to be a miserable failure. On the other hand, I’ll continue to play around with Wolfram Alpha if and when I want to be entertained. Heck, Twitter Search is probably the funnest one of them all, offering up real time returns on what other people are tweeting about which sometimes can come in handy.
But, when it comes to searching for what you want to find on the internet, Google still rules, controlling about two-thirds of the market and not about to cede its place to a young upstart especially one operated by its bitter rival, Microsoft.
Relevant? Not Quite.
Naturally, when I go to a search engine I enter in my name to see how often it is returned and what sort of returns are served. By taking my full legal name in quotes — “Matthew C. Keegan” — I come up with more than one million results, at least ten times the number I typically find on Google Search. Hmmm….
Okay, I know that I am famous, but I doubt that every single one of those results is accurate. Perhaps more telling is that when I click on the Image tab associated with my name, I find three actual pictures of me with several others being of unrelated photos I’ve used on my many different sites and a handful of other pictures of various objects I’ve never seen before. I may write about car engines, but I resent being associated with a diesel engine!
Playing Around With Bing
I’m not very scientific when it comes to trying out a new search engine, rather I use many of the same tactics I employ on Google Search to give Bing a whirl. Usually, I know almost immediately if a search engine holds promise based on what it does versus what I already know what Google can do.
Bing, even with some results for certain search terms not being all that relevant, still offered up some accurate and informative results for other terms I like to use. In fact, I managed to find some Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs) parallels with Google. I do like Bing’s clean interface and the preview information about each result that appears when you hover over it is certainly handy.
Not yet cluttered with a bunch of ads, the Bing “surface” is easy on the eyes, simple to navigate and doesn’t have that “thrown together” feel of Cuil. I like clicking on the Maps tab to find a location which shows how to get there from here while also revealing an aerial view, bird’s eye look and more. I will happily toss Mapquest for the chance to use Bing Maps, what may end up being an important pull to get me binging the ‘net.
Binging The ‘Net
All that said, I liked previewing Bing and plan to spend more quality time with the web’s newest search engine in the days and weeks ahead. Cuil failed out of the box, but Bing appears to have enough going for it to make a serious run as a search engine.
Will Bing challenge Google? It may, especially given Microsoft’s plan to throw $80-100 million dollars in advertising at it. Of course, Google won’t roll over without a fight which means that the winner of this battle will ultimately prove to be you, the web user.
See Also – Wolfram Alpha, The Only Search Engine You Need?

By Smoky, June 4, 2009 @ 1:36 am
So first MSN became Live, but now Bing is live, i man Live is Bing, I mean MSN changed to Bing, which is now live…
By Matthew C. Keegan, June 4, 2009 @ 4:11 am
Confusing isn’t it, Smoky? Some feel that Microsoft should have simply updated the old search engine instead of coming out with Bing. Regardless, it is new and it is here and it is live. Although it isn’t Live Search it is live search….
By Gregor, June 5, 2009 @ 7:48 am
It’s a nice looking search engine and it has some good unique functionality. But the killer thing is for a search engine to be relevant and until it surpassess Google (and Bing doesn’t) then it’s still not going to be as good as Google.
It’s a decent step forwards from MSN and live though. Perhaps in 40 years they’ll have caught up!
By Matt Keegan, June 5, 2009 @ 10:43 am
Agreed, Gregor — Google is still on top and they’ll have to slip up before Bing gets a chance to threaten their position. Still, I like having a good option to Google and so far Bing seems to provide that.
Matt Keegans last blog post..Ford Adjusts Incentive Program For Summer Season
By Wales Mortgage, June 8, 2009 @ 4:20 am
I just saw a short video about Bing, and it was nothing but impressive. And I guess he got it right when the voice over said “People don’t need another search engine, they need a decision engine”.
By Diety, June 10, 2009 @ 7:51 am
So is there anything Bing offers that Google doesn’t ? I visited the site and apart from amazing background pics, there is nothing that would make me want to forget about google in favor of bing.
The way I see it, success here isn’t really dependent on new features or groundbreaking changes, but solely on marketing. We’ll see how it works, so far Microsoft managed to seriously irritate me with the new Office Ad
By Dekoracje Okien, June 19, 2009 @ 5:17 am
Bing’s like google, only it loads slower (silly background graphics). Don’t see a point in using it unless they build it into windows 7. You know, if I could just quickly search for something without opening a browser. Then it might actualy work.
By Matthew C. Keegan, June 19, 2009 @ 5:19 am
Dekoracje, I wouldn’t be surprised if Microsoft bundled Bing with Windows 7 or used some other methods to make it widely available.