Has The President Overreached With GM & Chrysler?
I stopped what I was doing yesterday to follow the president’s news conference regarding the auto industry, particularly as related to General Motors and Chrysler, the two companies who have been at the center of the woes surrounding domestic production. I figured I needed to hear straight from Barack Obama what he had to say about the two automakers particularly since their fates are tied to whatever the federal government dictates to them.
GM CEO Rick Wagoner Resigns
Although the president announced that GM President/CEO Rick Wagoner had resigned on Monday morning, I knew over the weekend that he was already out. Indeed, one of Obama’s representatives asked for and received his resignation on Friday and by Sunday I saw that Automotive News had already shared that information with its readers.
Quite a few people have expressed dismay that the federal government has intervened in such a way with a public company, particularly by ousting the boss. Under normal circumstances I would have been appalled, but these conditions are far from normal.
Last fall, when the chairmen of Chrysler, Ford and General Motors appeared before Congress asking for federal support, I saw what was on the horizon: any funds received by the automakers would come with strings attached. After all, the money they would be getting would be from taxpayers, which is you and me.
Ford Management Must Be Grateful
Just as 2008 was drawing to a close and with the Bush administration three weeks away from ceding the White House to Barack Obama, loans for GM and Chrysler were approved while Ford’s request for a line of credit was denied. That denial was the best thing to happen to the Blue Oval as Ford has managed to stand to the side as all of the attention (mostly negative) has been focused on GM and Chrysler.
I have to think that there are a group of executives in Dearborn who are immensely grateful that George W. Bush ignored Ford’s request as that move has allowed the company to move forward without government oversight. Ford’s condition isn’t as dire at its domestic competitors, although if the market stays down for several more months, that could all change. Meanwhile, Ford is basking in the limelight as being the only solvent major U.S. automaker.
GM, Chrysler Buy Some Time
February 17th was the deadline for GM and Chrysler to get their restructuring plans to DC who promised to make a decision by March 31st regarding their respective fates. At yesterday’s news conference we learned that both companies have gained a little extra time, but with additional strings (more like ropes) attached.
Chrysler is expected to pursue its alliance with Fiat and must come to terms within thirty days to accomplish that feat. In the interim, Chrysler will receive some funding to stay alive and if the other parameters are met, then additional funding will come forth.
General Motors is expected to continue to negotiate with the United Auto Workers (UAW) to gain additional concessions while pressuring bondholders to do the same. The president remarked that GM (and Chrysler) had fallen short in their restructuring efforts and would be given sixty days to complete the process. Likely, several brands will be shuttered including Saturn and Hummer, possibly Saab and Pontiac too.
Restructure or Face Bankruptcy
Should either company fail to restructure, they’ll be forced into bankruptcy by the federal government. The president indicated that neither company would languish in that state for years, instead they’ll most likely be required to make rapid changes in a bid to quickly emerge leaner and smaller than before.
The United Auto Workers probably had a lot of say in how Obama proceeded on Monday, given the president’s strong union support in Election 2008. The United Auto Workers has made quite a few concessions of late, including the closure of the widely-panned JOBS program which gave workers full pay and benefits in lieu of layoffs. However, wage levels for union workers are still above what Toyota, Nissan and Honda pay their domestic workforce, a disadvantage the Big Three have pointed to for many years.
Guaranteeing Car Warranties
Besides UAW and GM bondholder concessions, the federal government has agreed to back new car warranties for GM and Chrysler, but not Ford. What this means is that if either Chrysler or GM does go through bankruptcy, then the federal government will pay for repairs on these vehicles. That move is meant to instill confidence in the two companies, encouraging hesitant consumers to make a purchase.
I believe we’ve only seen a portion of what is coming forth for GM and Chrysler, with the next 30-60 day period telling us much. A case could be made that the federal government shares some of the blame for the auto industry’s woes especially given the safety, fuel economy and pollution mandates that have saddled each company for decades.
Restructure Chrysler and GM or Die
But, restructuring could be the best thing for both companies as without it, neither could possibly survive. I am not thrilled that GM could end up becoming Government Motors when all is said and done, given the tens of billions of taxpayer dollars pouring into the company. How far the Obama administration goes in dictating what products GM will build is not known right now, but I would hate to see that responsibility shift from the automaker to DC.
I have never been confident that Chrysler could continue to survive an an independent entity even when Cerberus Capital Management L.P. acquired an 80.1% share in the automaker in 2007 (Daimler AG holds the remaining 19.9%). Thus, its alliance with Fiat is its only hope of survival, giving the company the opportunity to bolster its fleet with small cars while ceding 35% of it to the Italian automaker.
When all is said and done, the automotive landscape will likely be radically changed. If Ford can hang on, there is a good chance they’ll pass GM as the largest domestic producer of automobiles, with Toyota right behind them. The UAW will lose some of its bite, bondholders will see their investments shrink and as far as us beleaguered taxpayers go, we may or may not see a return on our investments.
Related Reading: Reluctantly, GM Chief Steps Down

By LarryJackson, March 31, 2009 @ 7:58 pm
I can’t say that I am pleased at all to see the direction Obama is taking with the Detroit automakers. You obviously know a lot more about this than I do, but it seems to me that with Obama forcing Rick Wagoner out at GM, an entirely new realm of possibilities is being opened up. Just how far is he willing to go? Which CEO will he ask to resign next?
While I have no problem with trying to save our environment, it appears that a lot of Obama’s policies are being driven by his desire to do so. His cap and trade policy will result in very high energy bills. One of his main complaints about the automotive industry is that they need to build green cars. As I said, working to save the environment is all well and good, but Obama seems to be more than willing to bankrupt the people of our country to do so and that troubles me greatly.
LarryJacksons last blog post..Obama’s attack on Detroit
By MattK, April 1, 2009 @ 4:32 am
Larry, you have raised a number of good points especially regarding Obama’s green push with the auto industry and his ouster of Rick Wagoner, which I believe is more symbolic than anything.
Taken by itself, Obama’s pronouncements have merit — GM and Chrysler should go through bankruptcy if they cannot restructure themselves (or in Chrysler’s case forge an alliance with Fiat). But, when you look at what the president has been doing since he took office and what his plans are for the future, can America afford the greater costs associated with a wholesale restructuring of our economy? I think not.
By The Hawg!, April 1, 2009 @ 10:32 pm
You are completely right — the best thing to happen to Ford is the denial of bailout money. Once again, we’ve seen that there’s a hefty price to be paid when a company accepts government cash (just ask Waggoner).
By the way, Chrysler already effectively went through a bankruptcy during the Carter administration when the company reorganized, creditors were forced to take cents on the dollar to retire Chrysler’s debts and contracts involving Chrysler were renegotiated, rescinded or plain ignored.
How many (real or actual) bankruptcies does Chrysler get and when will Chrysler be back in the same old mess its in now if the feds pull the company’s irons out of the fire again?
By Matthew C. Keegan, April 2, 2009 @ 4:36 am
Hawg, what you say is true: Chrysler may not have called it bankruptcy in the early 1980s, but they went through a similar restructuring which meant that union members had to accept pay cuts, suppliers less money and other creditors were forced to restructure their debt.
Once you give the federal government a toehold, watch out. Rick Wagoner lost his position months ago, he just learned this past weekend what that really meant.
Ford needs to find every way possible to avoid government intervention. Fortunately, Alan Mullaly seems to be the right man at the right time to see Ford through these tough times.
As for Chrysler, it looks like they never learn!
By Vlad Zablotskyy, April 2, 2009 @ 12:00 pm
I don’t like the idea when government takes over like their did in GM case period. Again my perspective may be a little blinded by still vivid memories of the communism in the former USSR.
If I was Obama instead of giving billions of our dollars to people who will waste them I would give that money to company like Tesla. Just my two cents.
Vlad Zablotskyys last blog post..AddThis Improves Usability and Reporting
By Matthew C. Keegan, April 2, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
Tesla Motors has shown some good promise, Vlad. Lots of California investors are pouring money into the company which has yielded the hot Tesla Roadster and an upcoming Tesla S sedan. The Google Boys are among the investors, so Tesla seems to be doing just fine without fed help.
By Jonny, April 3, 2009 @ 4:30 am
Your right about ford. Its just my prediction, but i believe ford will be the only one left. Henry Ford was the one that started the whole automobile industry years ago, and his proceeding men at charge are gonna be the ones to finish the job. Who knows, maybe an american automobile manufacturing monopoly will bring some jobs back here at home. Maybe with just one man running the show, he can do whatever the hell he wants… maybe it will put more overseas. We should see here for sure in the next few years. Just some food for thought =]
By Matthew C. Keegan, April 3, 2009 @ 4:45 am
Jonny, there is a good chance that Ford will be the only one left standing. However, I believe that a scaled back GM will emerge, several years down the road. Cadillac, Buick and Chevrolet will probably survive while the remaining divisions will be shuttered or sold.
Ford has an excellent opportunity to gain market share and the right product mix to stand head and shoulders above a number of companies including some of its largest competitors. They still have a lot of debt to handle, but if their products are well received, then they can whack that debt in the process.
By Brian, April 5, 2009 @ 8:16 pm
If Ford remains alive, then maybe capitalism does have a chance to live on a little longer. I will worry when Obama starts telling CEO’s that they can’t resign, which I can actually see him doing.
By Matthew C. Keegan, April 6, 2009 @ 4:53 am
Brian, I see a similar scenario unfolding: when the president asks certain CEOs to jump, they’ll be asking “how high?”
These are odd times in which we live, a crisis mentality is seizing our country, just the right atmosphere to get everyone worried and the government coming through looking like they’re the “white knight” in all of this. I’m not confident with the direction all of this is going and think Ford may eventually be sucked in.