The Carnage That Is Called Detroit

Yesterday was the deadline for General Motors and Chrysler to submit their respective recovery plans to Congress in a bid to show that they are making good faith efforts to move forward, with each company beating the 5 p.m. deadline handily.

Buick RegalBy last night news of what was in each report began to surface, but I chose to go online to watch a missed episode of The Closer instead. Ever since the networks positioned The Closer and “24″ against each other I’ve decided to watch 24 on Monday evenings while viewing The Closer at a later date. I’m not into American Idol and I certainly did not feel like watching the news!

So this morning I immediately began to rifle through my hard copy of The Wall Street Journal to find out what GM and Chrysler proposed, an easy task since it was headline news for the business newspaper. No shock there.

Not much of what the WSJ relayed was a surprise either because I was previously made aware that Hummer, Saab and Saturn weren’t likely to survive while Pontiac would be scaled back to just one or two models. Going forward, GM seems most interested in preserving its core brands which they have identified as Cadillac and Chevrolet as well as Buick and GMC.

Chrysler won’t be cutting additional brands, at least for right now, but their operation is still in flux pending approval of a possible strategic alliance with Fiat. Fiat has promised to supply Chrysler with several smaller cars in exchange for gaining a 35% stake in Chrysler LLC, an alliance of equally struggling automakers.

GM presented their case with several scenarios mentioned including the possible bankruptcy of the company. Not liquidation bankruptcy as in Chapter 7, rather restructuring bankruptcy as in Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankrutpcy code.

Still, the automaker said that it might need as much as $100 billion if they were to go through the traditional bankruptcy process or the government could “save” tens of billions of dollars by opting for a less drastic approach. Oh, by the way, GM needs an additional $16.6 billion to keep going for the next several months as well as a $7.7 billion loan from the Department of Energy to help develop fuel efficient cars.

Chrysler also mentioned bankruptcy while indicating that a $5 billion loan would keep the company solvent for a bit longer. Both companies are planning to shut down several more factories, trim production levels and lay off tens of thousands of workers. This is without considering bankruptcy, mind you. Expect thousands of dealers and tens of thousands of dealer employees to lose their jobs too.

While General Motors and Chrysler fight for their lives, America’s #2 automaker, Ford, is watching by the sidelines. It hasn’t asked for a government loan, though its request for a line of credit was turned down late last year. Ford has a bit more cash to play with as the automaker has hocked its plants and has been drawing down other lines of credit at its disposal. However, should the economy worsen over the next few months, expect Ford to press the issue and gain government funding.

Reading all of this has left me thinking of one word when it comes to the U.S. auto industry — carnage. There isn’t a pretty way to shrink their businesses nor can pain be kept to a minimum. Everyone smells blood but there aren’t predators coming in for the kill. Instead, the U.S. taxpayer in the form of the federal government is playing ambulance driver, hoping that they can rescue a pair of seriously injured automakers before their very lives have been lost.

I expected that 2009 was going to be a difficult year, but now I believe it will be downright ugly. Ugly for the employees who will lose their jobs. Ugly for the automakers who will lose the last vestiges of their independence and prestige. But extremely ugly for the American taxpayer who will be left paying the medical bills whether the patients recover or not.

  • By LarryJackson, February 18, 2009 @ 9:12 pm

    It’s a shame, but the American taxpayer is going to be left holding the bag and the bulk of the cost of this economic fiasco we are undergoing right now. You said it right when you said it’s going to be ugly.

    LarryJacksons last blog post..GM and Chrysler ask for more money

  • By No Swap Forex Account, February 19, 2009 @ 12:42 pm

    These auto companies are lame and I hope that they crappy ones falter and get out of our market. If they cannot stay afloat on their own accord then they need shifted out and we need someone who can survive in place.

  • By Matthew C. Keegan, February 19, 2009 @ 1:23 pm

    @ Larry — After Obama tried to scare Americans into accepting the stimulus package, GM took a page out his playbook to use against him. Supposedly, GM says that it’ll cost $100 billion to bail out GM through one scenario, an amount many times the company’s current worth.

    @ No Swap — Well, I think that this is happening. Even if the feds help GM and Chrysler, there is no guarantee that customers will follow suit. Looks to me that both companies have their backs to the wall.

  • By Ernie Small, February 19, 2009 @ 9:00 pm

    i wish i did not agree with you that ’09 is going to be an economic bloodbath, but unfortunately i do. hopefully things can eventually settle out after the purging is complete. as for whether these companies should be bailed out at all in the first place; well, it seems like we’re damned if we do and perhaps double-damned if we don’t….

  • By Matthew C. Keegan, February 20, 2009 @ 6:05 am

    Ernie, I would love to be wrong on this one, but I can’t see things changing much over the coming months. It’ll take 2009 and probably a good chunk of 2010 before things shake out. By then, who knows what we’ll be left with.

    Your country (Canada) could benefit if the US buys more of its oil from you. I read in The Wall Street Journal yesterday about the Alberta oil fields and I know that both of our countries could benefit if we were to work together on it. But, I fear President Obama is worried about greenhouse gases and, since the extraction method is less environmentally friendly, may simply choose to limit that trade.

  • By Iowa GMC, May 7, 2009 @ 6:22 pm

    I think it is interesting how GM seems only interested in ‘saving’ their Cadillac, Chevrolet, Buick, and GMC brands. I definitely think that was a smart move on them. Although i personally believe the auto bailout is a total sham.

  • By Matthew C. Keegan, May 8, 2009 @ 4:49 am

    I’m in agreement with the sham aspect! I also think that they could save Pontiac, given that the brand is sold alongside Buick and GMC at most retail outlets. How hard would it be for them to continue to sell the Pontiac G8 and the Pontiac Vibe? Two vehicle produced by Holden and Toyota respectively.

Other links to this post

  1. The Carnage That Is Called Detroit : reddit.com
  2. A1-Webmarks - User MattK
  3. Your page is now on StumbleUpon!
  4. Have You Signed Up For ‘U Comment - I Follow’? | Connected Internet
  5. drivelocity.com » Blog Archive » U Comment I Follow
  6. Fed CAFE Timing Is Bad Timing Indeed » Matt’s Musings