<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil Is Cool But Not Yet Hot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot</link>
	<description>The random thoughts of Matt Keegan, writing style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:21:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Is Cool But Not Yet Hot - Mixx</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil Is Cool But Not Yet Hot - Mixx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-380</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Is Cool But Not Yet Hot view photo   1 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Is Cool But Not Yet Hot view photo   1 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-371</guid>
		<description>I am of the view that cuil will not manage to break the big G&#039;s dominance in search. Cuil is going to fade into the background just like the rest because we are so used to the big G. I am told that the big G can manage to search successfully only a fraction of the enormous, sprawling internet, and their index can never be entirely up to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am of the view that cuil will not manage to break the big G&#8217;s dominance in search. Cuil is going to fade into the background just like the rest because we are so used to the big G. I am told that the big G can manage to search successfully only a fraction of the enormous, sprawling internet, and their index can never be entirely up to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Search Engine Cuil Launches But Something is Amiss &#124; SearchRank Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>New Search Engine Cuil Launches But Something is Amiss &#124; SearchRank Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-354</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] by: Matt Keegan &#124; July 28, 2008 10:32 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] by: Matt Keegan | July 28, 2008 10:32 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitwise Intelligence - Bill Tancer - US: Cuil Stats - The Early Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitwise Intelligence - Bill Tancer - US: Cuil Stats - The Early Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-352</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] by: Matt Keegan at August 4, 2008 04:24 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] by: Matt Keegan at August 4, 2008 04:24 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 bizzare Cuil search results - beats Google for humor &#124; Bloggle</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>7 bizzare Cuil search results - beats Google for humor &#124; Bloggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-345</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] by Matt Keegan 4th August, 2008 at 9:35 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] by Matt Keegan 4th August, 2008 at 9:35 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fastfastlane's blog, page 7 - StumbleUpon</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>fastfastlane's blog, page 7 - StumbleUpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-329</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]   [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...]   [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekPicks: Cuil Is Cool But Not Yet Hot</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekPicks: Cuil Is Cool But Not Yet Hot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-328</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] &quot;Challengers to Google&#8217;s search dominance seem to spring up from time to time with each promising something different from what the Mountain View, California company delivers. Mahalo has tried to present a fresh alternative to the Big G as have Wikiseek, Gigiblast, and a handful of others, but none have seriously threatened Google&#8217;s leadership.&quot;[via matthew keegan] [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] &#8220;Challengers to Google&#8217;s search dominance seem to spring up from time to time with each promising something different from what the Mountain View, California company delivers. Mahalo has tried to present a fresh alternative to the Big G as have Wikiseek, Gigiblast, and a handful of others, but none have seriously threatened Google&#8217;s leadership.&#8221;[via matthew keegan] [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John atte Wode</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>John atte Wode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-327</guid>
		<description>New search competition for Google from a site promising three times the number of searchable pages as Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New search competition for Google from a site promising three times the number of searchable pages as Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew C. Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew C. Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Mihaela, you raise some good points! However, I will say this: the $33 million raised is likely only the beginning point for Cuil. Most successful ventures go out for a second or third round of venture capital fundraising.

That being said, the emphasis will be on the word &lt;i&gt;successful&lt;/i&gt;. Very early on we agree that Cuil isn&#039;t a success, that it got off to a bad start, and something needs to be done and quick.

Our wanting Cuil to succeed won&#039;t make it happen, but I&#039;m a patient man and believe that if the Cuil team has a good product, then they&#039;ll work out the many flaws and come back stronger.

We need something besides Google; a viable product that can challenge the leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mihaela, you raise some good points! However, I will say this: the $33 million raised is likely only the beginning point for Cuil. Most successful ventures go out for a second or third round of venture capital fundraising.</p>
<p>That being said, the emphasis will be on the word <i>successful</i>. Very early on we agree that Cuil isn&#8217;t a success, that it got off to a bad start, and something needs to be done and quick.</p>
<p>Our wanting Cuil to succeed won&#8217;t make it happen, but I&#8217;m a patient man and believe that if the Cuil team has a good product, then they&#8217;ll work out the many flaws and come back stronger.</p>
<p>We need something besides Google; a viable product that can challenge the leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihaela Lica</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewkeegan.com/2008/07/28/cuil-is-cool-but-not-yet-hot/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihaela Lica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewkeegan.com/?p=71#comment-325</guid>
		<description>He he, Matt. I misspelled &quot;Ciul&quot; to start with myself and... &quot;Culi&quot; 
I wonder what these mean...

As you know I am not a Google supporter, I criticized their hypocrisy more than once, but we also need to see things realistically: Cuil is not better (OK, they just launched, but even on the long run, what&#039;s the point?) and it&#039;s certainly not bigger (despite their statements - see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/27/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isnt-the-whole-story/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechCrunch tests&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/we-knew-web-was-big.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&#039;s statements&lt;/a&gt;) $33 million in venture capital is not even enough to cover the monthly costs for in depth search... Nah... just because they are ex-Googlers and they know how Google works doesn&#039;t mean that they can actually build something better. 

Without the man power and the financial power of Google it is unrealistic to think they will succeed. I think they were made to sell, like Powerset and hakia and others. I hope I am wrong and they succeed. But I don&#039;t see how. I really don&#039;t.

Mihaela Licas last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ewriting.pamil-visions.com/2008/07/22/feedback-needed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Feedback Needed - The Best Music Site Is the Goal&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He he, Matt. I misspelled &#8220;Ciul&#8221; to start with myself and&#8230; &#8220;Culi&#8221;<br />
I wonder what these mean&#8230;</p>
<p>As you know I am not a Google supporter, I criticized their hypocrisy more than once, but we also need to see things realistically: Cuil is not better (OK, they just launched, but even on the long run, what&#8217;s the point?) and it&#8217;s certainly not bigger (despite their statements &#8211; see the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/27/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isnt-the-whole-story/" rel="nofollow">TechCrunch tests</a> and <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/we-knew-web-was-big.html" rel="nofollow">Google&#8217;s statements</a>) $33 million in venture capital is not even enough to cover the monthly costs for in depth search&#8230; Nah&#8230; just because they are ex-Googlers and they know how Google works doesn&#8217;t mean that they can actually build something better. </p>
<p>Without the man power and the financial power of Google it is unrealistic to think they will succeed. I think they were made to sell, like Powerset and hakia and others. I hope I am wrong and they succeed. But I don&#8217;t see how. I really don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Mihaela Licas last blog post..<a href="http://www.ewriting.pamil-visions.com/2008/07/22/feedback-needed/" rel="nofollow">Feedback Needed &#8211; The Best Music Site Is the Goal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

