Deadlines and Your Personal Preferences

Yesterday, I visited Anne Wayman’s The Golden Pencil blog and read her entry titled, “Nix Monday Writing Deadlines?” Her article discussed the reasons why Monday is not a good day for setting deadlines and I voiced my agreement. Clearly, Mondays are best used for catching up on weekend emails and establishing the week’s schedule. Besides, if a project is due on a Monday then that means only one thing — you’ll probably have to work through the weekend to finish it up.

The Pitfalls of Friday Deadlines

press releases

Fridays aren’t my favorite days either for the simple reason that projects seem to be due in the morning and not in the afternoon as people prepare for the weekend or leave work early, especially in the summer. True, if I work my schedule right I’ll get the job done on a Thursday making the Friday deadline moot. There is something to be said about not only beating a deadline but completing and submitting the work early — you can come across as being a hero in the eyes of your client.

Multi-part Deadlines

Sometimes deadlines involve a two-part process, the first being the submission of draft copies, the second being the submission of the final work. Depending on how extensive the changes are of the draft copy could determine when your final deadline will take place. I almost always like to finish my final work once I receive the changes recommended by the client — there is something to be said for turning around a project quickly, if possible.

Family Time — Not Willing to Give That Up

As far as weekend work goes, I almost always turn these projects down. For me, weekends is family time and if a special project involves me having to do anything more than two hours of work on a Saturday morning then it isn’t for me. I need my down time and my family needs me; I’m just not the type of guy who relishes giving up his personal time no matter how pressing the project may be.

Your Guide To Google’s PageRank Analysis Tool

Google PageRank is one tool that many webmasters use to measure the performance of their web pages. On a scale of 0 to 10, search engine leader Google ranks nearly every page on the internet with the lowest score generally going to new pages and the highest scores awarded to high traffic authority sites such as NASA, the White House, Google, and Adobe. Google picks a date when they take a “snap shot” of a web page and use the information from that visit to calculate PageRank. This snap shot visit occurs approximately 3-4 times annually, but the results are not made public until Google exports [updates] their toolbar to show the latest rankings.

Snap Shot v. Export

There is a lot of confusion and misinformation throughout the internet world regarding PageRank. Importantly, Google does not publicly announce the date they visit a page to take a snaphot. However, if you were to visit a high performing site such as TechCrunch you would find that those articles posted on April 2nd show PageRank while articles posted from April 3rd on do not. Therefore, it is fairly safe to assume that the snap shot took place on April 3, 2007 or there abouts (Please note: I seem to recall seeing articles posted two weeks later that had a higher PageRank soon after the April update, but they are returning PR0 today — this could mean that there previous PageRank is about to be changed — April 19th could have been the true snap shot date; when the next export takes place you can visit TechCrunch to determine the August [or earlier] snap shot.

Is PageRank Important?

Webmasters debate the importance of PageRank with some dismissing it as an effective measurement of a site primarily because other factors weigh in such as position on search engine results pages [SERPs], site traffic, other ranking tools [e.g., Alexa and Technorati], and more. Other webmasters live or die with each PageRank change especially if they use that number to sell advertising including links, banner ads, etc. Clearly, ad rates on a PR5 page are higher than on a PR4 page something not lost on people who make a living online. Putting Google’s paid link policy to the side, the 3-4 times yearly update is long anticipated. Indeed, if you were to visit Digital Point you would see that the forum’s most popular thread is titled, Google’s 2007-Q3 PageRank (PR) Update,” and has had some 140,000 page views as of this writing.

A Hint at Things to Come

Immediately before Google exports the latest PageRank information to the Google toolbar, there are some hints that an update is taking place. With the current PageRank change taking longer to be exported than usual, webmasters are reporting seeing the following changes to their sites:

Grey bar or “no ranking” status on the Google toolbar for a previously unranked page is now white or PR0.

Information obtained from sites that check Google’s data centers reveal that a change is in progress. Before PageRank is exported to the Google toolbar, some 700 or more data centers must update their information. This process can take as long as one week, but it gives long waiting webmasters a strong hint where their pages stand before the export is completed.

At least one person claims that the new PageRank shows up first for sites listed in the Google Directory (whose links and categorization are from the Open Directory Project).

Delay or Going Away?

The latest update has occured, but an export to the Google toolbar for PageRank has not yet taken place. The SEO Company has been tracking PageRank updates going back to 2000 and they also attempt to predict when the next toolbar export will take place. Yes, their July 21st export prediction is way off, but if you were to ask the majority of webmasters what date they originally had in mind, most would have picked August 13th or earlier.

There has been plenty of speculation for the delay, with some of that based on Google’s new policy of paid link reporting. Some are theorizing that Google is building in a penalty for sites with paid links while others are saying that Google is attempting to get a handle on the many spammy/splog sites that achieve PageRank and should not. Even a new ranking system called Trust Rank has been discussed as a new way of measuring sites which could explain the delay (Please note that TrustRank is not a Google product.)

Moving On

Whichever way the next export shakes out, it will likely be talked about for some time thereafter. Google’s Matt Cutts is the head of the company’s Webspam team and is often the voice people turn to figure out what Google is up to; while he isn’t saying much at the moment about PageRank, that is likely to change once the next export has been completed. PageRank is a closely guarded secret although Google does share some information about their algorithm from time to time (again, usually through Matt Cutts).

In all, many will speculate how and when a PageRank takes place, its importance, its future, etc. Unless Google clearly outlines this information, most of what you read isn’t 100% accurate including this guide. Yet, if it is “buzz” you want, then I don’t know of much else that equals the amount of speculating given to Google’s unique link analysis tool.

Further Reading

The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine

Google Technology (PageRank explained)

Search Illustrated: PageRank Explained


Photo Credit: Creative Commons — Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic — to FML